Journal Reflection #1 Academic Life and Scholarship Class: What did you learn?
Journal Reflection #1
Academic Life and Scholarship Class
What did you learn?
There were many takeaways from the first class in Academic Life and Scholarship. I gained a basket full of knowledge:
One aspect is that different
schools differ in how they are categorized based on how much funding they
receive. A good resource on how schools
are categorized is through the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of
Higher Education. I learned that there
are R1 institutions, R2 institutions, and D/PU, which are Doctoral / Professional
Universities. R1 universities have very
high spending and very high doctorate production. R2 is considered high spending ($5 million)
and high doctorate production. And then,
below that level, research colleges and universities may spend around $2.5 million.
I asked a couple of questions to
my professor and students. How do we
know what schools to apply to? Will I
get a job in academia at the end of my program?
A good resource to find what schools to apply
to is the website Higher Ed Jobs. If a
school only has a Baccalaureate program, it is considered a liberal arts school. So, Baccalaureate and Masters-only schools
may seek only teaching for tenured positions.
The difference is that they do not have doctoral students. Thus, their
teaching load is a lot more.
Next, to answer the other
question, being a competitive job market candidate includes at the Ph.D. student level--publishing, teaching,
presenting, doing research, and having a focused research agenda.
A great resource our professor
guided us to is a book called—The Professor is In by Karen Kelsky. Academia is not the only path. I could be a lecturer, seek a better or higher
paying job in the field that I am already in or go into consulting.
I now think that universities
are built on the same foundations as governments. Borrowing from Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address, “this
nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom and that government of the
people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth.” It is good that faculty from all over the
university serve on Dean Search Committees, as well as Tenure/Promotion Committees,
and that it is a Democratic process with self-governance.
I also learned a few more
things: it is beneficial to apply to jobs outside of the one you get your
degree from. Schools look for diversity
of academic thought, and thus, do not want people all from the same school or
background.
Next, academic freedom is novel
to me but sounds like a good concept. Professors
seek tenure to be able to reach the point one day where they can speak their minds
without repercussions. This concept is at
the heart of higher education thought processes.
Finally, I would like to
elaborate on my possible dissertation topic.
I want to study the support families give to adolescents with chemotherapy-induced
alopecia and how the support improves their self-esteem. Right now, in Advanced Statistics, we are
going to choose a robust data set for this research. I would like to use the Rosenberg Scale for Self-Esteem
for the adolescent and adult population and see which demographic factors play
a significant role in self-esteem.
I would like to say that my overall impression of this class is very good. The professor and students were very open and collaborative. I am excited to see how much I grow and how my assumptions change. As an aside, the reason I chose my dissertation topic is that I am an adolescent cancer survivor who encountered self-esteem problems with chemotherapy-induced alopecia. I wanted to have the tools, and my friends and family have the tools, to combat my low self-esteem around my hair loss.
ReplyDelete